How much do we blame the soldiers for following orders that we find repugnant? How much do we blame the military for being involved in a situation we found repellant. In the 70’s, activists blamed individual soldiers in a war with a freaking draft for their collective affiliation with the war. Fred Phelps is taking a similar, though even more psychotic, stand with his protests at funerals for American military members. I think he’s claiming they’re defending the right to sodomy. He’s off his meds.
So, can we denounce the military and, by extension, members of it for a moral failure if there is a collective fuckup, like an immoral war? Leaving aside the question of what constitutes a moral war, I say no. ROTC was damn tempting to me. I deliberately chose to stay out of the military because I didn’t want to turn over my decision making power.
Soldiers aren’t mindless, but they are subject to a system of authority, and they maintain that system for good reason. In emergency situations, like most violent ones, it is crucial to coordinate and respond rapidly. So they mantain a direct and ingrained decision making structure. But, soldiers also need a large degree of initiative. If a CO calls every shot, nothing gets done. Soldiers’ freedom isn’t in whether to be in Iraq, and, I suspect, generally isn’t in what they’re doing while they’re over there, but rather in how they do what they do.
If you want to blame someone for the military presence in Iraq, blame Bush (especially), Clinton, Bush Sr, and Regan, along with their administrations, but not the military. If you want to blame someone for what the military is doing, blame senior command, or a meddling administration. But if you want to blame individual soldiers, talk to them and find out what they were doing and why before you start casting stones.