poasted a link to a slate story discussing the draft.
I think the article’s main point is that you can’t go around conducting multiple major military operations with a small army. It rightly notes that there isn’t political support for the draft. Our military is stretched to the breaking point even with civilian contractors. (a.k.a. mercenaries) Q.E.D. We need to reduce the scope and/or number of our military engagements. It’s that or the draft.
I’m of two minds here.
One, I think there’s a lot to be said for mandatory universal military service, with possible substitutions of other types of public service. It gives everyone an appreciation of and stake in the nation’s military operations that they might not otherwise get. It builds communal bonds.
Two, I think of the reasons I was unwilling to go ROTC when I went to CMU. (sexuality was least among them) I don’t trust the political process that runs a soldier’s life. I’m not willing to turn off my own judgment, salute and say “Yes, sir!”
I think they’re both driven by the same motive, a desire for the ultimate expression of force to be employed responsibly.