personal peeve about economics

One of the things that has always driven me crazy about economics, particularly on the subject of labor economics, is the notion that hours spent working is always a negative utility. Given a 40 hour work week, for some people, this may be true. would doubtless protest this notion being applied universally. As, I suspect, would . I would certainly object to it being applied at 0 hours of work per week, having been there a time or two. Money aside, the value of the routine and the esteem effects from being productive have a definite value.

What really got to me is this quote from my econ prof, issued moments ago: “We work so that we can consume.” And to this I have only the following to say: Ewww.

Yeah, it’s a math model, yeah I care about money. But that particular statement seemed to reflect some terribly self-destructive tendencies that are overwhelming our society. Our esteem ought to come from what we make, not what we take.

Back to doing my homework in class. 😉

One thought on “personal peeve about economics”

  1. I have often found that economists are willing to choose their language in public statements in a manner which seems like they’re talking about the state of the world, when they’re really talking about the state of their models.

    I hope that my perception that economists often do not realize the difference between these two things is incorrect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *