So this one strikes me as pretty realistic. It calls me an INTP (and I think the balance does tip more T than F for me) but an ENFP wannabe. INFP for who I’d want to date, I’m a bit more skeptical on. I’ve noticed that I tend to go for the quiet ones, or sometimes the private ones. I also tend to prefer abstract thinkers. But I do so like rationals (even if we are occasionally a bit dull.) I also like people with a gentle organizing hand (the light J’s, as it were).
Enh. Yay for time-wasty-ness. =)
Actualized type: INTP
(who you are)
|
INTP – “Architect”. Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population.
|
(who you prefer to be)
|
ENFP – “Journalist”. Uncanny sense of the motivations of others. Life is an exciting drama. 8.1% of total population.
|
Attraction type: INFP
|
INFP – “Questor”. High capacity for caring. Emotional face to the world. High sense of honor derived from internal values. 4.4% of total population.
|
Take Jung Explorer Test
personality tests by similarminds.com
“P looking for a J” somehow brings to mind images of “sub looking for a dom”
That is all I have to say.
I am convinced that I have taken too many free Meyers-Briggs tests. All they tell me is that I am firmly an Ixxx. I drift between iNtuitive and Sensing (as high as 60% on either side), I’m usually more Thinking than Feeling (55% thinking), and I’m trying to be more Perceiving than Judging (but I’m not to 55% yet). For this test, my biggest difference between “are” and “prefer to be” was that I prefer to be more Feeling than I really am. I
thinkfeel that’s a good thing. (=Weird, I tested as ISTP for the first time (usually INTP), though just barely on the S axis with 52%.
It said I want to be an ISTJ and am seeking an ISTJ.