{"id":1039,"date":"2004-12-02T07:21:00","date_gmt":"2004-12-02T13:21:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cheerfulchaotic.crazycrew.org\/?p=1039"},"modified":"2004-12-02T07:21:00","modified_gmt":"2004-12-02T13:21:00","slug":"sexual-statistics-and-cultural-identification","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cheerfulchaotic.crazycrew.org\/?p=1039","title":{"rendered":"Sexual statistics and cultural identification"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Inspired by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.livejournal.com\/users\/cheerfulchaotic\/265446.html?thread=740326#t740326\">some<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.livejournal.com\/users\/cheerfulchaotic\/265446.html?thread=738790#t738790\">comments<\/a> on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.livejournal.com\/users\/cheerfulchaotic\/265446.html\">an earlier entry<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So, I actually do believe that we&#8217;re talking roughly chi-squared curves here (see graphic below) with the number of sex partners on the x-axis), kind of like income distributions.  And I think there is a significant bias towards gay guys having more partners.  Which is not to say that there are not monogamous or celibate gay guys out there, and that they&#8217;re aren&#8217;t incredibly promiscuous heteros, but on average, median, etc, I bet that gay guys get more bootay.  <\/p>\n<p>Remember, the plural of anecdote is not evidence. =)  I&#8217;m basing my conclusions on a few things:  Most prominently, gabriel rotello&#8217;s Sexual Ecology, in which he discusses the epidemiology of HIV, and (late in the book)  how it corresponds to the sorts of answers hetero&#8217;s give, and homo&#8217;s give when asked about the number of partners they&#8217;ve had.  Hetero&#8217;s  self-reported fewer partners per unit time than homo&#8217;s self-reported.  And the transmission rates supported their claims.  Additionally, gay guys can have a situation where two of one&#8217;s former partners can themselves partner up (happened to me).  In strictly heterosexual interactions, that&#8217;s just plain ol&#8217; not possible.  <\/p>\n<p>But, I think it&#8217;s nuts to pretend that there&#8217;s gay men, and everything else.  For starters, there&#8217;s bi folk.  And the sexual politics of lesbians are to my [limited] understanding, quite different from gay guy or hetero norms.  And grouping all heteros together as though they had the same norms is equally ridiculous.  Most heteros don&#8217;t have a strong (conscious) cultural identity based on their sexuality.  <\/p>\n<p>Kind of like the thing I noted in statistics last week.  The white population&#8217;s attitude to the courts showed much more variability by things like income, education, and even attitude towards marijuana than the black population&#8217;s.  I attributed this to a greater cultural unity among blacks.  Not saying that all blacks (or all homos, or all males, etc) belong to a unified culture, but that the &#8220;white identity&#8221; and the &#8220;heterosexual identity&#8221; is no one&#8217;s primary cultural self-identification.  I suspect white heteros are more likely to define themselves by profession, religion, class, or other such ideas.  <\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.uvm.edu\/~golivett\/introbio\/lab_reports\/chisquared.gif\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Inspired by some comments on an earlier entry. So, I actually do believe that we&#8217;re talking roughly chi-squared curves here (see graphic below) with the number of sex partners on the x-axis), kind of like income distributions. And I think there is a significant bias towards gay guys having more partners. Which is not to &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/cheerfulchaotic.crazycrew.org\/?p=1039\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Sexual statistics and cultural identification&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1039","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cheerfulchaotic.crazycrew.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1039","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cheerfulchaotic.crazycrew.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cheerfulchaotic.crazycrew.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cheerfulchaotic.crazycrew.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cheerfulchaotic.crazycrew.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1039"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cheerfulchaotic.crazycrew.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1039\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cheerfulchaotic.crazycrew.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cheerfulchaotic.crazycrew.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1039"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cheerfulchaotic.crazycrew.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}